<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon MP3, Wal-Mart and Rhapsody just made buying music more confusing following iTunes&#8217; lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.last100.com/2009/04/08/more-variable-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.last100.com/2009/04/08/more-variable-pricing/</link>
	<description>Tracking the digital lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:33:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Download Music</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2009/04/08/more-variable-pricing/#comment-72083</link>
		<dc:creator>Download Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/?p=4100#comment-72083</guid>
		<description>People complain about a little price hike. It&#039;s not fun for anyone, fine, but does anyone remember when online downloads weren&#039;t around? You&#039;d buy a full album for $20 because you liked 1 song. You might find there were 3-4 good songs on some albums but a lot of times, only that one radio hit did it for you so you went and spent $20 a song. Now iTunes and all the rest follow and run a variable pricing model on songs which goes as high as $1.29 per tune and everyone is freaking out. Recession? It&#039;s $1.29 for a song you get to keep, make copies of, burn, so practically whatever with. Online music downloads are still a fairly new product so you have to give it some time where a lot of changes will take place but still, I think people should relax cause online music download just made buying music so much more affordable, even if iTunes ever decided to go as high as $3 per song, though I could see at some point I&#039;d jump in on the arguing, but we&#039;re far from that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People complain about a little price hike. It&#39;s not fun for anyone, fine, but does anyone remember when online downloads weren&#39;t around? You&#39;d buy a full album for $20 because you liked 1 song. You might find there were 3-4 good songs on some albums but a lot of times, only that one radio hit did it for you so you went and spent $20 a song. Now iTunes and all the rest follow and run a variable pricing model on songs which goes as high as $1.29 per tune and everyone is freaking out. Recession? It&#39;s $1.29 for a song you get to keep, make copies of, burn, so practically whatever with. Online music downloads are still a fairly new product so you have to give it some time where a lot of changes will take place but still, I think people should relax cause online music download just made buying music so much more affordable, even if iTunes ever decided to go as high as $3 per song, though I could see at some point I&#39;d jump in on the arguing, but we&#39;re far from that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
