<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could we be edging closer to a Europe-wide &#8216;iPod tax&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.last100.com/2008/05/27/could-we-be-edging-closer-to-a-europe-wide-ipod-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.last100.com/2008/05/27/could-we-be-edging-closer-to-a-europe-wide-ipod-tax/</link>
	<description>Tracking the digital lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:33:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mind Booster Noori</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2008/05/27/could-we-be-edging-closer-to-a-europe-wide-ipod-tax/#comment-61077</link>
		<dc:creator>Mind Booster Noori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/?p=1901#comment-61077</guid>
		<description>&quot;Private Copy&quot; is defined as the concept introduced in 9.2 of the BERN convention ( http://law-ref.org/BERN/article9.html ):

&quot;It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction of such works in certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.&quot;

From this the various countries defined private copy as being &quot;reproduction of copyrighted works in the cases where such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.&quot;

The most used case of an example is &quot;if I buy a CD I have the private right to make copies of it, if they&#039;re to be used privately and there&#039;s no commercial exploitation of those copies&quot;. Oh, and if you look carefully, most of the entities that replied to EU&#039;s questionaire are more or less explicitly advocating the end of that right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Private Copy&#8221; is defined as the concept introduced in 9.2 of the BERN convention ( <a href="http://law-ref.org/BERN/article9.html" rel="nofollow">http://law-ref.org/BERN/article9.html</a> ):</p>
<p>&#8220;It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction of such works in certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.&#8221;</p>
<p>From this the various countries defined private copy as being &#8220;reproduction of copyrighted works in the cases where such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.&#8221;</p>
<p>The most used case of an example is &#8220;if I buy a CD I have the private right to make copies of it, if they&#8217;re to be used privately and there&#8217;s no commercial exploitation of those copies&#8221;. Oh, and if you look carefully, most of the entities that replied to EU&#8217;s questionaire are more or less explicitly advocating the end of that right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khurt</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2008/05/27/could-we-be-edging-closer-to-a-europe-wide-ipod-tax/#comment-61052</link>
		<dc:creator>Khurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/?p=1901#comment-61052</guid>
		<description>If the socalled &quot;iPod tax&quot; gave me inexchange the right to copy ( personal use ) music from my frieds collection then I have no issue.  But if all it does is make me pay because I have an iPod then HECK NO.  All of my current content is legally purchased and I don&#039;t share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the socalled &#8220;iPod tax&#8221; gave me inexchange the right to copy ( personal use ) music from my frieds collection then I have no issue.  But if all it does is make me pay because I have an iPod then HECK NO.  All of my current content is legally purchased and I don&#8217;t share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
