<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple patent for real-time IM on iPhone hints at what&#8217;s really to come</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.last100.com/2008/04/22/apple-patent-for-real-time-im-on-iphone-hints-at-whats-really-to-come/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.last100.com/2008/04/22/apple-patent-for-real-time-im-on-iphone-hints-at-whats-really-to-come/</link>
	<description>Tracking the digital lifestyle</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Jarrett</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2008/04/22/apple-patent-for-real-time-im-on-iphone-hints-at-whats-really-to-come/#comment-59077</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Jarrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/?p=1768#comment-59077</guid>
		<description>Another reason Apple may be developing IM now is to give Android-based phones less of an advantage once they appear.  The Android SDK has been out for a while now and from what I've read, instant messaging seems more at home on Android.  However, I do understand that the same hardware restrictions would apply if the processor/batteries are not up to scratch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason Apple may be developing IM now is to give Android-based phones less of an advantage once they appear.  The Android SDK has been out for a while now and from what I&#8217;ve read, instant messaging seems more at home on Android.  However, I do understand that the same hardware restrictions would apply if the processor/batteries are not up to scratch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
