<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Vudu set-top movie box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.last100.com/2007/10/10/review-vudu-set-top-movie-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/10/10/review-vudu-set-top-movie-box/</link>
	<description>Tracking the digital lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:33:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cjohn17</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/10/10/review-vudu-set-top-movie-box/#comment-13553</link>
		<dc:creator>Cjohn17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/2007/10/10/review-vudu-set-top-movie-box/#comment-13553</guid>
		<description>VUDU is Pointless &amp; Disappointing

VUDU has some really serious content issues - of the 5,000 advertised titles there&#039;s little to rent. Their movie library if filled with titles one would find on a Hong Kong street corner or flea market. Laughable, amateurish, appalling movies that look like they&#039;re been shot in someone&#039;s basement. Much of the catalog is purchase only. New releases are not available to rent for 3-4 weeks, if ever. Quite a few older titles that have been staples at Blockbuster, or gathering dust at a the local supermarket, are purchase only. 

VUDU moderators are blocking forum posts critical of the product.  

&quot;Vudu relies on a peer-to-peer network system for faster downloading. So, essentially, this company is using your bandwidth to help it save money it would have otherwise spent on its own servers and bandwidth.&quot; - Walt Mossberg, WSJ

&quot;Plenty of the movies are pure filler. They range from no-name horror cheapies (“San Franpsycho” or “Night Fangs,” anyone?) to superniche flicks like “The History of Texas Longhorns Football” and “Yoga for Depression and Gastro-Intestinal Disorders.”

Another reason: Vudu’s catalog is a victim of what Hollywood calls distribution windows. After a movie leaves theaters, it becomes available through other channels in a strict order: (1) hotels and airlines; (2) DVD; (3) pay-per-view television; (4) movie channels like HBO and Starz; (5) TV and everywhere else.&quot; - David Pogue, NYTimes

&quot;The average consumer, as long as he or she doesn&#039;t have true control over downloads thanks to technology such as digital rights management, is going to have a hard time justifying an expensive set-top box when it has neither the channel-surfing capabilities of a TiVo digital video recorder nor the low to nonexistent price of a DVR provided by a cable television company.&quot; - ZDNet

&quot;That doesn&#039;t count for much when you can&#039;t get &quot;the right movie, right now&quot;. The studios don&#039;t want to rent new releases, because they make more off sales... VUDU sucks and there is no reason to believe they will get better.&quot; - Keith Ohlfs, User Experience Architect, VUDU Inc. 11/24/07

My extended review: http://theillustratedconservative.blogspot.com/2007/11/vudu-pointless-disappointing.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VUDU is Pointless &amp; Disappointing</p>
<p>VUDU has some really serious content issues &#8211; of the 5,000 advertised titles there&#8217;s little to rent. Their movie library if filled with titles one would find on a Hong Kong street corner or flea market. Laughable, amateurish, appalling movies that look like they&#8217;re been shot in someone&#8217;s basement. Much of the catalog is purchase only. New releases are not available to rent for 3-4 weeks, if ever. Quite a few older titles that have been staples at Blockbuster, or gathering dust at a the local supermarket, are purchase only. </p>
<p>VUDU moderators are blocking forum posts critical of the product.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Vudu relies on a peer-to-peer network system for faster downloading. So, essentially, this company is using your bandwidth to help it save money it would have otherwise spent on its own servers and bandwidth.&#8221; &#8211; Walt Mossberg, WSJ</p>
<p>&#8220;Plenty of the movies are pure filler. They range from no-name horror cheapies (“San Franpsycho” or “Night Fangs,” anyone?) to superniche flicks like “The History of Texas Longhorns Football” and “Yoga for Depression and Gastro-Intestinal Disorders.”</p>
<p>Another reason: Vudu’s catalog is a victim of what Hollywood calls distribution windows. After a movie leaves theaters, it becomes available through other channels in a strict order: (1) hotels and airlines; (2) DVD; (3) pay-per-view television; (4) movie channels like HBO and Starz; (5) TV and everywhere else.&#8221; &#8211; David Pogue, NYTimes</p>
<p>&#8220;The average consumer, as long as he or she doesn&#8217;t have true control over downloads thanks to technology such as digital rights management, is going to have a hard time justifying an expensive set-top box when it has neither the channel-surfing capabilities of a TiVo digital video recorder nor the low to nonexistent price of a DVR provided by a cable television company.&#8221; &#8211; ZDNet</p>
<p>&#8220;That doesn&#8217;t count for much when you can&#8217;t get &#8220;the right movie, right now&#8221;. The studios don&#8217;t want to rent new releases, because they make more off sales&#8230; VUDU sucks and there is no reason to believe they will get better.&#8221; &#8211; Keith Ohlfs, User Experience Architect, VUDU Inc. 11/24/07</p>
<p>My extended review: <a href="http://theillustratedconservative.blogspot.com/2007/11/vudu-pointless-disappointing.html" rel="nofollow">http://theillustratedconservat.....nting.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
