<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old technology creates meaningful connections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/</link>
	<description>Tracking the digital lifestyle</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: genevieve</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>genevieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 07:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Agree with David Shen despite the fact that I read about 50/50 between paper and screen at present (which is why I'm here of course.)
The book technology is constantly being aped by electronic tech simply because it works so well, users are reluctant to abandon it. The single screen is one of the crucial difficulties electronic readers face, not to mention recharge and format issues...blah blah.

I know this sounds dumb, but I will use an MP3 player in the car by preference once they sell cars with them installed, with navigational buttons that are high on the dash, instead of on a small object well below windscreen height. Also I wish the one I'm using was bigger and wouldn't run out of battery every so often...sigh. 

There's nothing to stop you listening to a whole album as it was 'intended' on an MP3 player, and random play is a tremendous brain rattler for people over 45 anyway. Could be a great preventative for Alzheimer's methinks - I'm always saying to myself, 'what the hell is this?' because I fill the player with stuff I SHOULD listen to as well as stuff I love too well. In fact I need an MP3 player that announces the tracks over the speakers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with David Shen despite the fact that I read about 50/50 between paper and screen at present (which is why I&#8217;m here of course.)<br />
The book technology is constantly being aped by electronic tech simply because it works so well, users are reluctant to abandon it. The single screen is one of the crucial difficulties electronic readers face, not to mention recharge and format issues&#8230;blah blah.</p>
<p>I know this sounds dumb, but I will use an MP3 player in the car by preference once they sell cars with them installed, with navigational buttons that are high on the dash, instead of on a small object well below windscreen height. Also I wish the one I&#8217;m using was bigger and wouldn&#8217;t run out of battery every so often&#8230;sigh. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing to stop you listening to a whole album as it was &#8216;intended&#8217; on an MP3 player, and random play is a tremendous brain rattler for people over 45 anyway. Could be a great preventative for Alzheimer&#8217;s methinks - I&#8217;m always saying to myself, &#8216;what the hell is this?&#8217; because I fill the player with stuff I SHOULD listen to as well as stuff I love too well. In fact I need an MP3 player that announces the tracks over the speakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Shen</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>David Shen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>Old tech I won't give up? That's easy.

PAPER.

I love reading.  But holding a book or magazine in one's hand is much better than reading with a digital reader or on your PC.  The way the text and pictures are displayed via print is much more comfortable to the eyes.  And I enjoy carting around a paperback, knowing that I won't run out of power at some point, or worrying about spilling coffee on it.  I can also throw it away if I'm done, so I don't have to cart it around after I'm done.

You're right.  Sometimes old tech is better tech, even for someone as immersed in technology as me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old tech I won&#8217;t give up? That&#8217;s easy.</p>
<p>PAPER.</p>
<p>I love reading.  But holding a book or magazine in one&#8217;s hand is much better than reading with a digital reader or on your PC.  The way the text and pictures are displayed via print is much more comfortable to the eyes.  And I enjoy carting around a paperback, knowing that I won&#8217;t run out of power at some point, or worrying about spilling coffee on it.  I can also throw it away if I&#8217;m done, so I don&#8217;t have to cart it around after I&#8217;m done.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right.  Sometimes old tech is better tech, even for someone as immersed in technology as me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Catone</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Catone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>@Mack: Well, perhaps Justin Timberlake isn't the best example (though I am only very slightly familiar with his music), but take, for example, Pink Floyd.  There is a very specific way that Roger Waters intended for you to listen to his music.  For me, I feel like on an iPod I am far more likely to jump in and listen to "Breathe" and then jump to Pearl Jam on the next track.  When I have my "Dark Side of the Moon" CD loaded up, I don't have that luxury (sure I could skip tracks on the CD, but I feel less likely to do that).

Also, there is something nice about holding a physical CD.  It has permanence, and nostalgia, and some sort of "realness" that I find MP3s lacking. (And don't get me wrong, I have a library of 10,000 songs on my computer that I listen to while I work ;) -- I'm not anti-MP3 (or AAC or WMA or Ogg or whatever floats your boat) by any means).

I think Alex makes a good point when he says, "it boils down to is how you approach your own technology. You can use it to enhance your own preferences, or you can let it or other people influence the way you do things."

Well said. :)

(Then again, I could just be nuts -- always a possibility. :D)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mack: Well, perhaps Justin Timberlake isn&#8217;t the best example (though I am only very slightly familiar with his music), but take, for example, Pink Floyd.  There is a very specific way that Roger Waters intended for you to listen to his music.  For me, I feel like on an iPod I am far more likely to jump in and listen to &#8220;Breathe&#8221; and then jump to Pearl Jam on the next track.  When I have my &#8220;Dark Side of the Moon&#8221; CD loaded up, I don&#8217;t have that luxury (sure I could skip tracks on the CD, but I feel less likely to do that).</p>
<p>Also, there is something nice about holding a physical CD.  It has permanence, and nostalgia, and some sort of &#8220;realness&#8221; that I find MP3s lacking. (And don&#8217;t get me wrong, I have a library of 10,000 songs on my computer that I listen to while I work ;) &#8212; I&#8217;m not anti-MP3 (or AAC or WMA or Ogg or whatever floats your boat) by any means).</p>
<p>I think Alex makes a good point when he says, &#8220;it boils down to is how you approach your own technology. You can use it to enhance your own preferences, or you can let it or other people influence the way you do things.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well said. :)</p>
<p>(Then again, I could just be nuts &#8212; always a possibility. :D)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>I can understand what you mean.. but to be honest I have never felt an urge to jump from one artist to the next, nor have I ever felt the need to create play-lists of my favourite tracks.

I have a 60Gb Mp3 player, which is a pure joy to have on my frequent 2+ hour drives from my country-side life to the big city. At the start of my journey I select a couple of albums that I want to listen to and queue them up. Then I sit back and enjoy the drive.

Recently I forgot my mp3 player and had to resort to some old tapes I had in the car. I really don't want to have to do that again. The sound quality was awful, some of the tapes weren't what they said they were and fast forwarding was painful.

I have to say that I feel completely connected with the music on my Mp3 player and enjoy it on a regular basis. Since I started purchasing music digitally I find it impossible to buy a couple of tracks from an album - I have to purchase the whole thing. I know countless times over the years I have bought CD's and dismissed a couple of tracks as being weak, only to discover that that these tracks are the actual gems on an album. In addition I've always found other people's incomplete music collections (usually a result of iTunes) to be extremely frustrating ("What do you mean you only have track 4 from such and such...!?").

So I think what it boils down to is how you approach your own technology. You can use it to enhance your own preferences, or you can let it or other people influence the way you do things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand what you mean.. but to be honest I have never felt an urge to jump from one artist to the next, nor have I ever felt the need to create play-lists of my favourite tracks.</p>
<p>I have a 60Gb Mp3 player, which is a pure joy to have on my frequent 2+ hour drives from my country-side life to the big city. At the start of my journey I select a couple of albums that I want to listen to and queue them up. Then I sit back and enjoy the drive.</p>
<p>Recently I forgot my mp3 player and had to resort to some old tapes I had in the car. I really don&#8217;t want to have to do that again. The sound quality was awful, some of the tapes weren&#8217;t what they said they were and fast forwarding was painful.</p>
<p>I have to say that I feel completely connected with the music on my Mp3 player and enjoy it on a regular basis. Since I started purchasing music digitally I find it impossible to buy a couple of tracks from an album - I have to purchase the whole thing. I know countless times over the years I have bought CD&#8217;s and dismissed a couple of tracks as being weak, only to discover that that these tracks are the actual gems on an album. In addition I&#8217;ve always found other people&#8217;s incomplete music collections (usually a result of iTunes) to be extremely frustrating (&#8221;What do you mean you only have track 4 from such and such&#8230;!?&#8221;).</p>
<p>So I think what it boils down to is how you approach your own technology. You can use it to enhance your own preferences, or you can let it or other people influence the way you do things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack D. Male</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack D. Male</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>Josh - I think you're crazy :)

I am not sure I understand what you mean when you say that older technology causes you to form stronger connections with the music itself. How is listening to Justin Timberlake on an MP3 player or computer any different than on a CD or minidisc? Music is music, and I think you can connect with it using any device or medium. Attending a Justin Timberlake concert, on the other hand, could have an impact.

Some other thoughts: CDs take time to create and burn, digital music can be searched, the random button accomplishes what you want with not skipping music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh - I think you&#8217;re crazy :)</p>
<p>I am not sure I understand what you mean when you say that older technology causes you to form stronger connections with the music itself. How is listening to Justin Timberlake on an MP3 player or computer any different than on a CD or minidisc? Music is music, and I think you can connect with it using any device or medium. Attending a Justin Timberlake concert, on the other hand, could have an impact.</p>
<p>Some other thoughts: CDs take time to create and burn, digital music can be searched, the random button accomplishes what you want with not skipping music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 07:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.last100.com/2007/07/27/old-technology-creates-meaningful-connections/#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>I don't have an iPod or similar device. I'd like to get one someday, but just haven't been able to justify the expense at this time in my life. So many other items are more important to me right now (e.g. mortgage). Anyways, there is a certain nostalgia associated with older technology - for example, I still remember fondly the Apple II series and the Commodore 64 - both if which handed again I could enjoy. But, on a more practical note there are some things about old technology that are missed because they were useful. For example, I miss when all computers made noises to indicate that the CPU was thinking. It was a good way to tell whether a computer had frozen. I also remember the connection sound of a modem, and how beautiful was and how I could determine whether the connection was healthy or not by its sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have an iPod or similar device. I&#8217;d like to get one someday, but just haven&#8217;t been able to justify the expense at this time in my life. So many other items are more important to me right now (e.g. mortgage). Anyways, there is a certain nostalgia associated with older technology - for example, I still remember fondly the Apple II series and the Commodore 64 - both if which handed again I could enjoy. But, on a more practical note there are some things about old technology that are missed because they were useful. For example, I miss when all computers made noises to indicate that the CPU was thinking. It was a good way to tell whether a computer had frozen. I also remember the connection sound of a modem, and how beautiful was and how I could determine whether the connection was healthy or not by its sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
