Comments on: iPhone’s support for 3rd party apps won’t please everyone

By: JaRda

JaRda — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:35:03 +0000

and web-based utilities?

so:) from now it will be dependent on wi-fi and mobile network together?

funny, but practical? or: it can buy only very good blinded people..

I thought that apple wants to create only sweet useful devices……..

(written on macbook :)

By: JaRda

JaRda — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:28:15 +0000

exactly, iPhone could be a very good device, without stupid mining of money, which smells like Bill Gates.
Jobs should think about situation, if iPhone with apps like Skype wouldnt have much wider use, than now stupidly delimited device, because this is that one reason, why not to buy it.

I thought that apple says that is five years ahead in technology..
So, why uphold archaic slow and expensive-to-use cellular networks?

(sorry for my english:)

By: Steve O'Hear (editor)

Steve O'Hear (editor) — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:22:12 +0000

I agree Voice over IP would be a major block to Apple “selling” to iPhone to mobile operators.

By: iPhone Forum

iPhone Forum — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:15:47 +0000

I think the reason behind this is clearly Skype. Apple and Cingular do not want Skype to run on their phones. Thats also why most of the PDA phones available through Cingular do not have wifi, which should be standard.

By: Steve O'Hear (editor)

Steve O'Hear (editor) — Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:12:28 +0000

@Mitch

Flash support on iPhone has not been confirmed, and I’m doubtful it will happen. My reasoning is two-fold: First, Steve Jobs would have made a big deal about it today, surely? Second, YouTube is already converting its catalogue to Apple’s favored h.264 codec ready for AppleTV. Which would also suit the iPhone.

By: Mitch

Mitch — Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:06:49 +0000

Has it been announced whether iPhone will support Flash content? If so, development of Flash based apps via Flex will work.